Pages

Sunday, 1 June 2014

Unit 6 LO1 Understand how media producers define audiences for their products‏.

How might a media institution use Qualitative research. How effective is this form of research? 

Qualitative research is very important for a media institution, its research which primary research which allows media institutions to gain an understanding of what the target audience is thinking or feeling first hand. Aspect such as opinions, interests and underlying reasons can be explored in qualitative research. This type of research is extremely helpful to uncover new trends and discover problems, all together a question can be explored in a lot of depth with qualitative research and that is why media institutions find it very valuable when trying to find what sells to the target audience. Ways Qualitative research is generally researched is through focus groups, interviews, trials and leading questionnaires, these questions can then be expanded upon if needed.

Qualitative research generally gives more accurate results compared to quantative research which targets many, many people for their opinion. Quantative research is mainly done with surveys, polls, tick sheets etc. This type of research is done to get the opinion of a larger population, which is then converted into statistic.
Media institution uses a mix of both of these research methods to gain a better understanding of their target audience.

Now we are going to look at three different types of magazines which are niche, alternative and mainstream. These magazines rely on feedback from their audience on reviews and these days’ online reviews too. The magazine can have surveys attached to it and the audience can answer in their own words what they like about the magazine, what they want to read about and what the magazine can do to make the reading experience better. This is very valuable for media institutions as they can see specifically where they can improve and using this knowledge they can improve their product.

Niche magazines are magazines which target small groups of people, a specific type of audience. An example of a niche magazine is ‘SciFiNow’ magazine, according to SciFiNow their target audience are people who are into The SciFi genre, people invest early in the latest technologies, have a fascination of the entertainment industry and are hyperactive online. They also say that their target audience profile is 80% males, 20% female, aged 20-45.

When researching of how to improve their magazine they target these people in particular because they will give the most accurate results and will not be bias as it will be their own opinion, this magazine also has an online website, the website also helps a lot for qualitative research as the audience is able to give their feedback on online surveys and can also put forward their own ideas.


Alternative magazines are similar to niche magazines but they tend to target larger audiences and are generally more popular. An example of an alternative magazine is ‘Games master’, this magazine targets video gamers of all console and platforms. This magazine has been around for years and the editors know the value of qualitative research which is why they always pursue in collecting as much information they can from their audiences. By doing this they have improved and keep improving the magazine and have a very happy audience.

Firmographic research explores the information of the company and market in a lot of detail. The most common aspects it explores are employee size, revenue size, industry, number of locations and location headquarters.  Firmographic research looks into organizations and these categories to discover the values of trends and distribution. This sort of research is a more recent method being used and uses a more statistical and computerized approach. Firmographic research can describe a lot about a person like background, age, ethnicity and social status, using this research the media institutes can very accurately see patterns in research and anomalies which they will try and improve.
Psychographic research studies the target audience as an individual or sometimes a small group, in explores aspects like interests, lifestyle, hobbies, personalities, attributes etc. this type of research is valuable for media institutes as they can study their target audience is great detail. More of a social research method, it  allows them to have an idea of other possible ways to reach out to them or perhaps find content which would also appeal to them.



How might a media institution create and use target audience classifications. How effective is this form of research?


There are many different ways media institutions target their target audience but there are different ways to target different target audience. Different people come in contact with different types of advertising and media, some groups of these people may come in contact with specific media platform more than other. because of this media institutes need to use I to their advantage, In the day and age we live in now, social networking is exploding with popularity amongst many people but especially younger individuals.Sites like Facebook, Instagram and especially twitter are places where word can travel extremely fast, companies take advantages of such site in many ways. Twitter is a big one as companies, which make adverts, tend to hash tag their institute or something relating to it afterwards, this is done so people can discuss it of twitter and soon many, many tweets are made about that specific thing.

An example of this would be x-factor which hash tags many words for example #xfactor, then on twitter people will tweet about #xfactor and soon it catches fire and many people join into the discussion. This is very effective marketing amongst young people, when targeting older target audiences TV adverts and print media tend to be more effective because they are not as tech savvy as younger generations.
Target audience classification is there so that media products such games video games, movies, magazines etc. are appropriate for the right age groups. An example of this is in gaming PEGI system, different video games are for different audiences, if there is a game, which has violence, sex and drugs it will not be suitable for younger less mature audiences. Therefore the PEGI system regulates what can be bought and what can be advertised.

An example of this would be the infamous Grand theft auto games, which many have said to be very explicit, very violent and even, has gameplay where you torture a person. Because of it having such extreme content, PEGI have rated it 18+, this means no one under 18 can purchase the game.
The BBFC is the British board of film classification; similar to PEGI they class films according to age so the it is appropriate for the right viewers.

Here is a list of classifications which every feature film in the UK are classified by:


A recent film which was rated by the BBFC is a film called Haunted; this is a horror film with BBFC insight saying it contains scenes with strong violence, sexual violence, and gruesome images. Because of this the BBFC classed it as 18 which mean only adults can buy and watch this film in cinemas. Just in case Hollywood companies will often submit early rushes of film footage to get a classification of the scene, with this they can ensure that they will receive the right classification for their target audiences


In conclusion I would say that quantities research is an extremely accurate at giving the media institute an idea of what their audiences want and how to reach out to them. Also with the classification systems I believe this actually helps media institute to target their audience specifically.



How might a media institution use quantitative research? how effective is this form of research?



Quantative research is essential for media institutions as it gives them the opinion of their audience as if they are critics rather than an audience. With the results they gain they can improve their product a lot more, plus they can hear what ideas the audience have and what they would like to see, this is valuable for later projects as well as changing certain products to be improved.

The reason why it is so effective is because of how much information can be collected from the audience, not just yes and no answers but in fact they are able to receive highly in depth answers which will answer the questions asked and then expand on that question and even lead into other areas. Plus they are speaking their own mind which is not biased or one sided meaning this in accurate to an individual level
.
RAJAR (Radio Joint Audience Research) and BARB (broadcaster’s audience research board) are two of the UK’s largest production company. According to RAJAR they are ‘the official body in charge of measuring radio audiences in the UK. It is jointly owned by the BBC and the RadioCentre on behalf of the commercial sector.’


BARB is very similar to RAJAR but they are the official body which are in charge of television viewing figures in the UK. Their job is to count how many people are watching TV in the UK, what they are watching and the collect all the data and tally them each week.

Here is a screen shot showing the latest tally of UK TV channels:


RAJAR also put the results they gain online, they also look at other factors in their results such as digital platforms, average listeners per hour, radio listeners via mobile or tablet device etc.










The value of this research to media institution is already very easy to see, using the research collected by BARB and RAJAR. Many media institutions will use the research collected by these companies to their advantage, one situation would be if a TV series is dropping viewers, BARB will have information which could answer why it is dropping in views. 

Sometimes it could be for reasons such as a new show on a different channel or a massive sports event such as world cup matches which more people are likely to watch. With this information from barb media institutions can tactically get around these problems. This also allows media institutions to see whether further investment to the TV or radio show is worth investing in, this sort of quantative research is very valuable to media institutions.

Quantative research is generally easy to gather and analyse as its straight forward answers and can be looked at in a statistical way. This is in a format where anyone can understand and can be shown very easily, problems and advantages are shown in an extremely simple fashion. Compared to qualitative research this is very fast, very broad and very easy to understand but it lacks the quality.

 Quantative research does not have the richness is data that qualitative research can get; I believe that a mix of both methods are needed for media institutions to get the most out of their research.


Conclusion

The importance of research is important in any field of work, it allows you to assess what you have and come up with strategies but it is especially important with media institutions which can have massive audiences on national and even global levels.

 For these institutes research can hold a lot it stake and the right research is priceless. They must also can what the audience has to heart, unlike other products where you get the customer to buy, here you have to change yourself in order to make the customer want to buy which means that their opinion in most important. I believe that a mix of both methods is needed for media institutions to get the most out of their research. This is because with both methods being used can complement each other and much more data can be found out rather than just having one by itself. 

Why have the pros and cons of research method when you can use two and cancel out all the cons and just have the advantages? The most successful media institutions know this and value both methods to gain the best results.


Bibliography


http://www.scifinow.co.uk/
date: 03/06/2014
http://www.barb.co.uk/
 date: 04/06/2014


http://www.rajar.co.uk/
date: 04/06/2014


0 comments:

Post a Comment

 

Blogger news

Blogroll

About